- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
CNN anchor Jake Tapper interrupted Vice President Kamala Harris' rally in Arizona during a live broadcast on Thursday, providing "two teeny little fact checks" regarding the Democratic nominee's remarks.
Harris was campaigning in Arizona as Democrats strive to maintain their momentum in this critical swing state. Many forecasts suggest that former President Donald Trump has an advantage in Arizona, though the race is exceptionally close.
During Thursday's episode of *The Lead with Jake Tapper*, CNN aired a segment of Harris' rally in Phoenix, where she criticized Trump’s economic policies and his statements about reproductive rights. She claimed that Trump's proposed "20 percent national sales tax" would cost the average American an additional $4,000 annually, referring to his plan for a 20 percent tariff on all imports. Additionally, Harris condemned Trump's abortion policies, stating that he "hand-selected three members of the United States Supreme Court" with the aim of overturning Roe v. Wade.
Harris further asserted, "Did everyone hear what he just said yesterday? That he will do what he wants, quote, and here's where I'm going to quote: 'Whether the women like it or not.'"
Shortly after her speech, Tapper provided fact-checks on Harris’ claims. He noted, "First of all, she keeps referring to the Trump proposal on tariffs as a sales tax. It's not a sales tax. You can debate the merits of tariffs, but it's incorrect to call them a sales tax."
Tapper also clarified the context of Trump's statement, explaining that he was referring to his intention to protect women rather than suggesting he would act without their consent. He remarked, "Certainly, you can take issue with the language, but he wasn't saying he was just going to do whatever he wanted."
Trump made his controversial comments about protecting women during a rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin, stating that his campaign advisors had warned him against using that phrase. He recounted, "My people told me... they said, 'We think it's very inappropriate for you to say.' I said, 'Why? I'm president, I want to protect the women of our country.'"
Polls indicate that Trump is significantly trailing Harris among female voters, a demographic that tends to turn out in higher numbers during elections. Concerns have arisen among some Republicans, including former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, who warned that Trump's rhetoric may alienate women voters. She said, "Fifty-three percent of the electorate are women... that is not the way to win women."
Economists have also expressed concerns regarding Trump’s tariff proposals. While they could potentially benefit U.S.-based manufacturers, they would likely lead to higher prices for consumers. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, stated, "It's a really bad idea... You're going to push this exceptionally good economy into a ditch."
Moreover, a group of 23 Nobel Prize-winning economists recently warned that a second Trump presidency could result in higher prices, increased deficits, and greater inequality. Some of Trump's supporters, like Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, have suggested that while his economic policies might involve short-term challenges, they could yield long-term benefits for America.
Trump's running mate, U.S. Senator JD Vance of Ohio, echoed this sentiment in an NBC News interview, asserting, "Anything that you lose on the tariff from the perspective of the consumer, you gain in higher wages, so you're ultimately much better off."
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
A tariff is not a sales tax, true, but the effects of a tariff are the same as a sales tax on the item(s) the tariff is applied to. But it's worse than a sales tax in that trading partners whom the tariffs are imposed on will likely retaliate with tariffs on American goods. An international trade war does not bode well for economic growth.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Trump does not say how he will protect women but definitely says he will enact his plan whether women like it or not. I doubt many women will find his assertion comforting given Trump's propensity to abuse women, not to mention his conviction for sexual assault. Harris' criticism of his plan to protect women and his assertion he will do it whether it is wanted or not is not simply an issue of context, but something much more troubling...the candidate's difficulties with integrity and misogyny.
Well said, I only hope people will take note of what you said,
DeleteDemocrats after having more money than trump, more media support than trump, more scholars than trump, ended up loosing, I wanted them to win too, but they did not. They solely based their campaign on decency, political correctness, race, gender, women rights, abortion etc mostly himan emotional aspects, but clearly more than half of the Americans do not care about those. I think for a unconventional candidate like trump, democrats should have chosen unconventional candidate as well. Clearly Americans care about economy and border, for which Democrats have no answer to, now it's the decisions made by democrats is going to destroy the country, which they will later end up fixing again. This vicious cycle will continue even after trumps death, if democrats wouldn't change their conventional politics.
Delete